Plexus Consulting Group    Success Stories

National Association of College & University Business Officers (NACUBO)


National Association of College & University Business Officers (NACUBO)

2501 M Street, NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20037
202-861-2500
www.nacubo.org



Contact:
Carla Balakgie, CAE, Executive Director
CEO: James E. Morley Jr.
Budget: $5 - 9.9 Million
Staff Size: 60+




Plexus Consulting Group, LLC
1620 Eye Street, NW
Suite 210
Washington, DC 20006
Phone:  202-785-8940
Fax:      202-785-8949
Email:   info@plexusconsulting.com


Vital Stats:

Founded in 1962, NACUBO members include two-thirds of all institutions of higher learning in the United States and chief administrative and financial officers of over 2,100 colleges and universities.

NACUBO's stakeholders include four primary regional affiliates, the "ACUBOS", managed by volunteers: WACUBO (Western), CACUBO (Central), SACUBO (Southern) and EACUBO (Eastern). Many of these regional "parent" affiliates have served members for over 100 years.

The Challenge | The Solution | The Process | Unintended Consequences | Unforseen Benefits | Measurements & Results | Lessons Learned

 

The Challenge

How to develop a rapid and flexible organizational response in the face of technology driven competition and unprecedented customer demands?

The rapid pace of technological change is transforming the creation and delivery of higher education. A few years ago and for the first time in the industry's history, consumers began to dictate to higher education service providers. NACUBO executives were keenly aware of the need to develop a future-focused organization.

Also, there was significant potential for overlap and confusion of roles between the national association, a 501(c)(3) lobbying entity and full-blown service provider in its own right, and its respective "parents", regional affiliates quickly being outgrown by NACUBO. The volunteer organizations began to realize that they "can't do it all anymore." The national trend of shrinking volunteer resources had already begun to make an impact on the regional affiliates. James E. Morely, Jr., former EACUBO president and NACUBO's president/CEO for the past five years, recognized the makings of an industry on the brink of potential turmoil. How could NACUBO "do things differently" to work with its affiliates and continue to deliver leading-edge services to members?

The Solution

To address the challenge, NACUBO planned and implemented an effective strategy of collaboration with its volunteer-led regional organizations to streamline service delivery to their mutual constituency. Ultimately, the solution was to bring the 5 organizations, NACUBO and the regional ACUBOs, to the table to create a partnership, the "ACUBO 20/20 Initiative".

The goal was to help these organizations, the "ACUBOs", to collaborate to effectively and competitively address the needs and demands of the higher education industry. Specifically, NACUBO sought to enhance development and delivery of mutual service offerings while leveraging existing resources, volunteers and staff.

The ACUBO 20/20 Initiative represented a collaborative planning and change effort undertaken jointly by the ACUBO associations. Its key objectives were to:

  • Better serve the needs, both current and emerging, of higher education administrators.
  • Improve the quality, quantity and access to services provided to these individuals and institutions.
  • Implement change to improve the way in which the ACUBOs operated.

The overriding goal of the initiative is best demonstrated through the Initiative Summary Statement: The ACUBO's seek a redefinition and alignment of their respective missions, values, and desired outcomes aimed at increasing the overall value of ACUBO membership.

Essentially, the 20/20 Initiative was a strategic change management project comprised of small components. An unprecedented collaborative effort, it is a model for planning and innovation for the five ACUBOs as well as an ongoing process to identify how these entities will continue to plan separate and joint activities together.

The Process

The three-phase process involved extensive analysis by the five organizations of the existing environment, trends and issues that were affecting the higher education industry.


Phase I: 1999 - 2000 Strategic Planning "Advance"
Phase II: Membership Diversification and Growth; Program/Service/Product Development and Delivery
Phase III: Financial Resources; Volunteer & Staff Resources/Non-ACUBO Structures; Image, Public Relations, Alliances


Phase I: 1999 - 2000 Strategic Planning "Advance"

  • Phase I of the change process included the following steps/activities:
  • Preparation of content and logistics for inaugural strategic planning "advance".
    Brainstorming session with Board of Directors and key staff to distill priority issues.
  • Preparation of Report on the ACUBO 20/20 Work Session including summary conclusions from the planning meeting.
  • Preparation of content and logistics for 2000 planning "advance".
  • Development and roll-out of the ACUBO 20/20 Strategic Communications Plan.


Every year, NACUBO's Board of Directors participates in an annual planning retreat aptly re-named a planning "advance". Three-fourths of the Board is comprised of regional leadership, in addition to at-large directors. In 1999, this event was used to lay the groundwork and create an atmosphere for the ensuing discussion regarding such a collaborative effort. In an unprecedented move, NACUBO devoted the entire two-day meeting to the singular topic of building the relationship between NACUBO and its regional affiliates.

The discussion included desires for wholesale change but quickly and wisely focused on the importance of creating change incrementally. Identifying "chewable chunks" would help build trust and successful working relationships among the ACUBOs. Together with Doug Eadie, a change management expert, NACUBO's executive team undertook a brainstorming session and created the "ACUBO 20/20" organizational innovation initiative. "ACUBO 20/20" means clear vision for the future. It also represented an effort to define what the ACUBOs' future might look like in the year 2020. There were complicated emotional issues to resolve. The five independent and highly autonomous affiliates shared a great deal of common ground: goals, interests and membership. They had to be convinced that there was more value to be gained in their working together than working separately.

The process also involved analyzing the services of the five associations and how they were organized to meet member needs. The goal was to help the ACUBOs to define a desired vision for the future, design new ways of operating, and chart a path to provide the best quality services and value to members and other customers.


Some of the issues addressed and identified in Phase I included:

  • Enhanced collaboration on the development and delivery of professional development offerings.
  • Increased service to all types of higher education institutions and more individuals at those campuses.
  • An improved dues structure, which recognized the value delivered in professional development activities, congressional and regulatory support, and membership support.

This change management model was purely anticipatory. There were no imminent financial or management crises on the horizon, but a sense among the leadership of the five organizations was that "the time is right". Not taking action would diminish NACUBO's effectiveness at best and perhaps eliminate it at worst. This was a "survival-driven issue before survival was an issue."


Strategic Communications Plan: To succeed, it is critical to obtain participant buy-in at an early stage and to ensure the "inclusiveness" of the process. This involved developing a "skunkworks" R&D task force with representation from each of the five owner organizations. The task force was given complete freedom and encouragement to operate and think outside of any of the existing constructs of the ACUBO organizations. In fact, their greatest challenge was to abandon the existing operational models and to identify, even experiment, with new ones. They set to work and distilled five priority issues for the ACUBO 20/20 Initiative. These were:

  • Membership Diversification and Growth (Phase II)
  • Program/Service/Product Development and Delivery (Phase II)
  • Financial Resources (Phase III)
  • Volunteer & Staff Resources/Non-ACUBO Structures (Phase III)
  • Image/PR/Alliances (Phase III)


For each of the priority issues, NACUBO identified development teams that were:

  • Comprised of members appointed by each affiliate organization.
  • Responsible for generating proposals for practical innovation projects for the ACUBOs to implement together.

During the culmination of Phase I at the 2000 Advance, the leadership agreed with the conclusions of the "skunkworks" task force and identified the development teams. The overall goal of this 2000 advance process was to "capture the impetus to change" by generating proposals for the practical innovation projects that the ACUBOs could undertake together. The strategy underpinning this was to identify the most strategic and discrete projects ("near-term opportunity targets) first followed by longer-term "large-scale opportunity targets", and then pushing toward systemic reform step-by-step.


Phase II: Membership Diversification and Growth; Program/Service/Product Development and Delivery

During this phase, the ACUBOs analyzed the programs, services and products of the five associations and how they were organized to meet member needs.

Phase II included meetings of the 20/20 development teams to address the following key issues:

  • Membership diversification and growth.
  • Re-Imagining the development and delivery of programs, services and products.

The work of the 20/20 Membership Diversification and Growth Development Team had three primary purposes.The first was to analyze both the near-term and large-scale "opportunity targets" (i.e. projects). The second purpose was to identify additional projects that may have been overlooked and finally to recommend to the 20/20 Task Force priority items for action with regard to membership.

The Membership Diversification and Growth team recommended the following near and large-term projects:

  • Near-Term Opportunity Targets:
    • Project 1: Access existing "non-core" member categories to determine value, need for expansion, elimination or modification.
    • Project 2: Employ a survey model to assess existing member motives for belonging to and using services from the ACUBO associations.
    • Project 3: Create a pricing structure to allow more individuals from member institutions to receive the Business Officer magazine.
  • Large-Term Opportunity Targets:
    • Project 1: Comprehensive membership assessment of ACUBO current and prospective members.

The work of the 20/20 Programs, Services and Products Development Team had three primary purposes. The first was to analyze both the near-term and large-scale "opportunity targets" (i.e. projects). The second purpose was to identify additional projects that may have been overlooked and finally to recommend to the 20/20 Task Force priority items for action with regard to programs, services and product development. Work focused on identifying initiatives to address the following priority issues:

  • Optimization of professional development offerings within and among the ACUBOs.
  • Optimization of professional development offerings involving partnerships with non-ACUBO partners.
  • Establishment of an enterprise management portal to serve the needs of the ACUBOs.

The Membership Diversification and Growth team recommended the following near and large-term projects:

  • Near-term Opportunity Targets:
    • Project 1: Create a speaker and topic database.
    • Project 2: Create and maintain an integrated calendar.
    • Project 3: Conduct a demonstration project with other associations.
    • Project 4: Reengineer advisory council (ongoing).
  • Large-Scale Opportunity Targets:
    • Project 1: Develop an ACUBO web portal
    • Project 2: Create collaborative program model


There was preliminary analysis of the various issues surrounding potential collaborative projects. Two major issues that needed to be looked at were:

  • Identification of additional opportunities beyond those established above as near-term or large-scale opportunity targets.
  • Prioritization of opportunity targets and recommendations for which should be pursued and in what order.

Phase III - Financial Resources; Volunteer & Staff Resources/Non-ACUBO Structures; Image, Public Relations and Alliances

Phase Three was designed to identify specific projects in the areas of:

  • Financial Resources
  • Volunteer & Staff Resources/Non-ACUBO Structures
  • Image, Public Relations and Alliances

The process will follow similar steps and activities to those outlined in Phase II.

The Phase II Program/Serivce/Product Development and Delivery issue area, along with Membership Diversification and Growth, were addressed in the spring of 2000. The remaining Phase III development teams, Financial Resources, Volunteer & Staff Resources and Image/PR/Alliances were scheduled to conclude their efforts towards the end of 2000.

Indeed, ACUBO programs represented not just the "heart" of the ACUBOs, but the "heart, brain, arms and legs." With 100-year histories, a strong track record and pride in delivery, this issue formed the primary area of overlap among the ACUBOs, and would have to be addressed carefully to ensure wise leverage of resources. One such project, the GASB (Government Accounting Standards Board) Distance Learning Initiative - - currently in the process of being developed - - involved the collaboration of all five ACUBO organizations in running and sharing both human and financial resources.

Staff Resources: With the exception of consulting expenses and the creation of a new full-time position to coordinate the 20/20 Initiative, work is being implemented using NACUBO's existing resource and volunteer base. However, where NACUBO staff dedicated to the process had previously been accountable to only one "boss", this has expanded to "five bosses" as a result of the Initiative, which involves considerable additional challenges in relationship management.

Unintended Consequences
While this effort has had a profound affect on all of the partner organizations, the process has not been without some difficulties. NACUBO staff identified the following challenges:

  • Abandoning existing operational models and identifying and experimenting with new ones.
  • Sharing both human and financial resources effectively in developing collaborative initiatives.
  • Identifying, prioritizing and implementing new opportunities for growth and collaboration.

Unforeseen Benefits

 Unforeseen benefits of the 20/20 Initiative included:

  • A new "brand" with joint ownership - - the ACUBO.
  • A new management vocabulary.
  • Ultimately, the innovation model first developed and tested as a discrete project transformed the culture of 5 separate organizations into one of "continual innovation."
  • Re-designed, comprehensive web portal.

Through this process, NACUBO discovered that in looking for "quick fixes", traditional strategic planning models have become obsolete. For the first time, NACUBO tied strategic planning and innovation together in the 20/20 process and the organization will never be the same.

Measurements & Results

The first 18 months of the initiative was spent carefully and intentionally preparing and implementing each step of the visioning process, and integrating the participants to ensure that everyone concerned was adequately included. The investment paid off.

The level of consensus and willingness to cooperate was no less than astounding, according to Carla Balagkie, NACUBO's Senior Vice President. "There was no headwind - it was like slicing butter." While NACUBO staff formed the "backbone" of the 20/20 Initiative, the principals, all volunteer board members and full-time chief operating officers (the most "tapped" volunteers known to the ACUBO family), were able to achieve significant progress in this complicated change management initiative. But it is an exercise in continuous improvement. NACUBO's 20/20 "Swat team" members continually ask themselves if the model is agile and innovative enough.

The process is still underway, and while the results are not yet complete, measurement criteria will include:

  • Securing and monitoring "short-term" wins to build progress and trust.
  • Increased membership.
  • Improved financials.
  • Better service to core clients, especially in professional development.
  • Development of certification programs.
  • Pro-active strategic alliances with vendors to enhance client service.

Lessons Learned

The most valuable lesson involved learning how to innovate by doing. There was an "unrelenting need" to be constantly creating and anticipating and nothing routine about the process. The 20/20 initiative has developed into a "living organism" and very dynamic process that is constantly unveiling new opportunities. Ultimately, NACUBO determined that the Initiative was required to "survive and thrive." According to Carla Balagkie, "this is not about a single innovation effort, this is about an organization trying to learn innovation and live it."